On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:53 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:49:44PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > Other than bots, this patch doesn't seem to have attracted any > reviewers > > > > this time around. Perhaps you need to bribe someone? (Maybe "how > sad > > > > your committer SSH key stopped working" would do?) > > > > > > > > > > Hmm. I don't think that's a bribe, that's a threat. However, maybe it > will > > > work. > > > > > > > IMHO the patch is ready to go - I think the global barrier solves the > > issue in the previous version, and that's the only problem I'm aware of. > > So +1 from me to go ahead and push it. > > > > And now please uncomment my commit SSH key again, please ;-) > > For adding cluster-level encryption to Postgres, the plan is to create a > standby that has encryption enabled, then switchover to it. Is that a > method we support now for adding checksums to Postgres? Do we need the > ability to do it in-place too? > I definitely think we need the ability to do it in-place as well, yes. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
