On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:35 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > [...] > > In this state I think this patch should be flat out rejected. >
Ok. > I'm seriously baffled at how this stuff is being pursued aggressively, > quite apparently without any serious design considerations. I mean this > stuff had to be backed out twice, yet it's being reproposed without much > consideration for concerns? > And what if (again) for the first version of session start hook we do it just for: - client backends - background workers For sure we'll need new design, but for now I'm can't imagine a use case for sessions different than listed above. Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
