On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:15 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Apologies for not helping much here; I'm on vacation for a couple of > weeks.
No worries, please take your time. > On 2019-Oct-08, Amit Langote wrote: > > > I couldn't imagine how that trick could be implemented for this case. :( > > Can't we pass around an ObjectAddresses pointer to which each recursion > level adds the object(s) it wants to delete, and in the outermost level > we drop everything in it? I vaguely recall we implemented something > like that somewhere within the past year, but all I can find is > 20bef2c3110a. I thought about doing something like that, but wasn't sure if introducing that much complexity is warranted. Thanks, Amit
