Yeah, why bother. Even ’native’ encryption/SSL in PG (were one to use it ‘natively’, as we do) is so good; adding yet another layer seems overkill…
Lou Picciano > On Oct 9, 2019, at 6:39 PM, Steve Crawford <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:56 PM Timmy Siu <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Dear all postgresql developers, > > I have tested postgres v11 against TCP Wrappers but it does not respond > to TCP wrappers port blocking. > > May I suggest the community to have postgres to work with TCP wrappers.?? > Its security will be better. > > > The last stable release of TCP Wrappers was a couple decades ago. It's > deprecated in RHEL7 and removed in RHEL8. I'm not a PG core member or > anything but rather doubt that's an area where the developers will want to > expend effort. > > Cheers, > Steve >
