On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:39, Eugen Konkov <kes-...@yandex.ru> wrote:
If we should follow this form, then IS DISTINCT should be written as: > x =! y > This looks unusual, because JavaScript also follow != form. so I hope > it will be easy to detect/implement != form, which I used to read as: > negate the result of comparison > Postgres already allows != as a synonym for <>. I think having =! mean something subtly but significantly different is a terrible idea. At a minimum we would have to remove the synonym, which would be a backwards compatibility break.
