On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 11:11:13AM -0300, Igor Calabria wrote:
Yeah, I agree that there's no reason to store the digests themselves and I
really liked the idea of it being optional.

That's not what I wrote. My point was that we *should* store the digests
themselves, otherwise we just introduce additional errors into the
estimates, because it discards the weights/frequencies.

If it turns out that memory consumption on real workloads is small enough,
it could eventually be turned on by default.


Maybe, but it's not just about memory consumption. CPU matters too.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to