On 2019-Sep-04, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I just noticed that we list auxiliary processes in pg_stat_ssl: [...] > But this seems pointless. Should we not hide those? Seems this only > happened as an unintended side-effect of fc70a4b0df38. It appears to me > that we should redefine that view to restrict backend_type that's > 'client backend' (maybe include 'wal receiver'/'wal sender' also, not > sure.)
[crickets] Robert, Kuntal, any opinion on this? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
