Horiguchi-san,

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:20:07 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> 
> wrote in
> > Only two people complaining about the wording?  Considering as well
> > that we use that wording in the docs and there were no complains about
> > that IIRC, I don't feel a need to change that, TBH.

> But the most
> significant point in the previous mail is using "foreign tables using
> postgres_fdw" instead of "postgres_fdw foreign tables".

OK, but as I said above, I don't feel the need to change that.  How
about leaving it for another patch to improve the wording in that
message and/or the documentation if we really need to do it.

> And the other
> point is using different message from temporary tables.

You mean we should do s/prepare/PREPARE/?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


Reply via email to