On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 00:30, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 12:11 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I guess I thought of that as a debugging feature and took it out
> > because it was too verbose, but maybe it just needs to be controlled
> > by the VERBOSE switch. Do you think we should put that back?
>
> By which I mean: would you like to send a patch? :-)
>
> Here is a new version of the "Leader:" patch, because cfbot told me
> that gcc didn't like it as much as clang.
>
I was reviewing this patch and here are a few comments,
+static void
+ExplainNodePerProcess(ExplainState *es, bool *opened_group,
+ int worker_number, Instrumentation *instrument)
+{
A small description about this routine would be helpful and will give the
file a consistent look.
Also, I noticed that the worker details are displayed for sort node even
without verbose, but for scans it is only with verbose. Am I missing
something or there is something behind? However, I am not sure if this is
the introduced by this patch-set.
--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih
