On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:48:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Re-reading the thread.  Any design change should IMO just happen on
> master so as we don't take any risks with potential ABI breakages.
> Even if there is not much field demand for it, that's not worth the
> risk.  Thinking harder, I don't actually quite see why it would be an
> issue to provide default stats for an hypothetical BRIN index based
> using the best estimations we can do down to 10 with the infra in
> place.  Taking the case of hypopg, one finishes with an annoying
> "could not open relation with OID %u", which is not that nice from the
> user perspective.  Let's wait a bit and see if others have more
> arguments to offer.

Okay.  Hearing nothing, committed down to 10.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to