On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:53 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:51:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yah.  Although, looking at the code in be-secure-openssl.c,
> > it doesn't look that hard to do in an extensible way.
> > Something like (untested)
> While we are on the topic...  Here is another wild idea.  We discussed
> not so long ago about removing support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 from the
> tree.  What if we removed support for 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 for 13~.  This
> would solve a couple of compatibility headaches, and we have TLSv1.2
> support automatically for all the versions supported.  Note that 1.0.0
> has been retired by upstream in February 2014.

Is 1.0.1 considered a separate major from 1.0.0, in this reasoning? Because
while retiring 1.0.0 should probably not be that terrible, 1.0.1 is still
in very widespread use on most long term supported distributions.

 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

Reply via email to