On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Few other things, I would like you to consider.
> 1.  I think disable_parallel_leader_participation related code can be
> extracted into a separate patch as it is mainly a debug/test aid.  You can
> also fix the problem reported by Mahendra in that context.
> 2. I think if we cam somehow disallow very small indexes to use parallel
> workers, then it will be better.   Can we use  min_parallel_index_scan_size
> to decide whether a particular index can participate in a parallel vacuum?

Forgot one minor point.  Please run pgindent on all the patches.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to