On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:11 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I don't think you can make that conclusion. Perhaps the table once > needed a toast table because of some wide column that got dropped; > if so, it'd still have one. It'd be safer to look at > pg_class.reltoastrelid to verify existence (or not) of the toast relation.
I believe that output was already shown earlier in the thread. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
