On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:32 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Thomas Munro <[email protected]> writes: > > Erm, but I shouldn't have to reindex my hash indexes (at least not > > until someone invents collation-based equality and therefore > > necessarily also collation-based hashing). How can we exclude that? > > Um, we already invented that with nondeterministic collations, no?
Urghlgh, right, thanks, somehow I missed/forgot that that stuff already works for hashing (neat). So we do need to track collation version dependencies for hash indexes, but only for non-deterministic collations. I wonder how best to code that.
