Greetings, * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:06 PM Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Just consider this part of the recovery toolkit. > > I agree that it would be useful to have a recovery toolkit for reading > uncommitted data, but I think a lot more thought needs to be given to > how such a thing should be designed. If you just add something called > READ UNCOMMITTED, people are going to expect it to have *way* saner > semantics than this will. They'll use it routinely, not just as a > last-ditch mechanism to recover otherwise-lost data. And I'm > reasonably confident that will not work out well.
+1. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
