On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 17:46, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 13:07, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> With regard to this point, I second Tomas's comments. > > > I also agree with Tomas' comments. I am explaining *why* it will be an > > improvement, expanding on my earlier notes. > > This function is called extremely frequently in query processing and is > > fairly efficient. I'm pointing out cases where making it even quicker > makes > > sense. > > I think the point is that you haven't demonstrated that this particular > patch makes it quicker. >
Not yet, but I was trying to agree what an appropriate test would be before running it. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
