On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:00 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > BTW, I forgot to mention: while I think the patch to forbid pseudotypes > by using CheckAttributeType() can be back-patched, I'm leaning towards > not back-patching the other patch. The situation where we get into > infinite recursion seems not very likely in practice, and it's not > going to cause any crash or data loss, so I think we can just say > "sorry that's not supported before v13". The patch as I'm proposing > it seems rather invasive for a back-branch fix.
It is indeed. Just to be sure, by going with "unsupported before v13", which one do you mean: * documenting it as so * giving an error in such cases, like the patch in the first email on this thread did * doing nothing really Thanks, Amit
