Greetings, * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote: > I'm not objecting to adding it, I'm just curious. In fact, I think > that if we do add this, then we should probably add lcm() at the same > time, since handling its overflow cases is sufficiently non-trivial to > justify not requiring users to have to implement it themselves.
I tend to agree with this. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
