Dean Rasheed <[email protected]> writes: > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42"
is an int not a smallint.
regards, tom lane
Dean Rasheed <[email protected]> writes: > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42"
is an int not a smallint.
regards, tom lane