Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42" is an int not a smallint. regards, tom lane
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42" is an int not a smallint. regards, tom lane