On 2020-Jan-09, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Hmm, so why not revert the test only in the back branches, given that > > it's not so onerous in master? > > I grow tired of repeating myself, but: it's purely accidental that this > test passes in master for the existing set of buildfarm members.
Oh, I forgot we had that problem. I agree with reverting the test, rather than building all the extra functionality needed to make it more stable, in that case. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
