On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:10 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2020-01-20 06:30, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Rebased against 40d964ec997f64227bc0ff5e058dc4a5770a70a9 > > I'm not sure that description of parallel vacuum in the middle of > non-full vs. full vacuum is actually that good. >
I have done like that because parallel vacuum is the default. I mean when the user runs vacuum command, it will invoke workers to perform index cleanup based on some conditions. > I think those sentences > should be moved to a separate paragraph. > It seems more natural to me to add immediately after vacuum explanation, but I might be wrong. After the above explanation, if you still think it is better to move into a separate paragraph, I can do that. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
