> this point me and Jesper inclined to go with the second option. But maybe > I'm missing something, are there any other suggestions?
Unfortunately I figured this would need a more invasive fix. I tend to agree that it'd be better to not skip in situations like this. I think it'd make most sense to make any plan for these 'prepare/fetch' queries would not use skip, but rather a materialize node, right? -Floris
