> On 6 Feb 2020, at 20:04, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this should be reverted. Perhaps there's a way to do it without > these problems, but we failed to find one in the past.
Or change to the v1 patch in this thread, which avoids the problem by doing it in the OpenSSL code. It's a shame to have generic TLS functionality be OpenSSL specific when everything else TLS has been abstracted, but not working is clearly a worse option. cheers ./daniel
