On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:28:05AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > I think it is reasonable.
Indeed, that makes sense to me as well. I am adding Peter Eisentraut in CC as the author/committer of 8a3d942 to comment on that. > By the way, I'm not sure the criteria of setting a GUC variable as > GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY, but for example, ssl_max/min_protocol_version, > dynamic_library_path, log_directory, krb_server_keyfile, > data_directory and config_file are GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY. So, it seems to > me very strange that ssl_*_file are not. Don't we need to mark them > maybe and some of the other ssl_* as the same? This should be a separate discussion IMO. Perhaps there is a point in softening or hardening some of them. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
