Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
> Having code which is untested and not excercised by developers (or users, if 
> my
> assumption holds), yet being reachable by SQL, runs the risk of introducing
> subtle bugs.  Is there a usecase for keeping it, or can/should it be removed 
> in
> 14?  That would still leave a lot of supported versions to upgrade to in case
> there are users to need this.

Pushed.  Looking at the original commit, I noticed one now-obsolete
comment that should also be removed, so I did that.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to