On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 7:02 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apart from that, I have also extended the solution for the page lock. > And, I have also broken down the 3rd patch in two parts for relation > extension and for the page lock. >
Thanks, I have made a number of cosmetic changes and written appropriate commit messages for all patches. See the attached patch series and let me know your opinion? BTW, did you get a chance to test page locks by using the extension which I have posted above or by some other way? I think it is important to test page-lock related patches now. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v7-0001-Assert-that-we-don-t-acquire-a-heavyweight-lock-on-a.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0002-Add-assert-to-ensure-that-page-locks-don-t-participa.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0003-Allow-relation-extension-lock-to-conflict-among-para.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0004-Allow-page-lock-to-conflict-among-parallel-group-mem.patch
Description: Binary data
