On 2020-Mar-16, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Also, should we call it "is_index_clustered", since otherwise it sounds alot > like "+get_index_clustered" (without "is"), which sounds like it takes a table > and returns which index is clustered. That might be just as useful for some > of > these callers.
Amit's proposed name seems to match lsyscache.c usual conventions better. > Should we use your get_index_isclustered more widely ? Yeah, in cluster(), mark_index_clustered(). -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
