On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:47 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > It seems to me that the easy thing to do is to implement this initially > without > FREEZE (which is controlled by vacuum_freeze_table_age), and defer until > July/v14 further discussion and implementation of another GUC/relopt for > autovacuum freezing to be controlled by insert thresholds (or ratio).
Freezing tuples is the point of this patch. As I have said, if you have a table where you insert many rows in few transactions, you would trigger an autovacuum that then ends up doing nothing because none of the rows have reached vacuum_freeze_table_age yet. Then some time later you will get a really large vacuum run. It seems to me that if we keep trying finding the formula that will vacuum every table just right and never so the wrong thing, we will never get to anything. Yours, Laurenz Albe
