Hi, On 2020-03-26 10:12:39 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 23:19 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > I am reluctant to introduce new semantics like a reloption value of -2 > to disable a feature in this patch right before feature freeze. > > I believe there are enough options to disable insert-only vacuuming for > an individual table:
> - Set the threshold to 2147483647. True, that will not work for very > large tables, but I think that there are few tables that insert that > many rows before they hit autovacuum_freeze_max_age anyway. > > - Set the scale factor to some astronomical value. Meh. You *are* adding new semantics with these. And they're terrible. Greetings, Andres Freund
