Guancheng Luo <prajnam...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 01:00, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This would reject, for example, a hash index associated with a btree-based
>> partition constraint, but I'm not sure we're losing anything much thereby.
> There is cases when a BTREE index associated with a HASH partition key, but I
> think we should allow them,
> as long as their equality operators consider the same value as equal.
Ah, yeah, I see we already have regression test cases that require that.
I pushed the patch with some cosmetic revisions. I left out the
regression test case though; it seemed pretty expensive considering
that the code is already being exercised by existing cases.
Thanks for the report and patch!
regards, tom lane
