> > I propose we define "planner" and make "optimizer" a <glosssee> entry. >
I have no objection to more entries, or edits to entries, but am concerned that the process leads to someone having to manually merge several start-from-scratch patches, with no clear sense of when we'll be done. I may make sense to appoint an edit-collector. > I further propose not to define the term "normalized", at least not for > now. That seems a very deep rabbit hole. > +1 I think we appointed a guy named Xeno to work on that definition. He says he's getting close...
