On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 00:25, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have pushed pg_stat_statements and Explain related patches. I am > now looking into (auto)vacuum patch and have few comments. > > I wasn't paying much attention to this thread. May I suggest changing wal_num_fpw to wal_fpw? wal_records and wal_bytes does not have a prefix 'num'. It seems inconsistent to me. Regards, -- Euler Taveira http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
