On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:15:00PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > I understood the situation and am fine to back-patch that. But I'm not sure > if it's fair to do that. Maybe we need to hear more opinions about this? > OTOH, feature freeze for v13 is today, so what about committing the patch > in v13 at first, and then doing the back-patch after hearing opinions and > receiving many +1?
I have not looked at the patch so I cannot say much about it, but it is annoying to fetch segments you are not going to need anyway if you target recovery with a timeline older than the segments fetched and this has a cost when you pay for the bandwidth of your environment with only one archive location. So a backpatch sounds like a good thing to do even if recovery is not broken per-se, only slower. Designing a TAP test for that is tricky, but you could look at the logs of the backend to make sure that only the wanted segments are fetched with a central archived solution and multiple timelines involved. And costly it is. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
