Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> However, even with that change, we're still testing that a checkpoint is
> 216 bytes ... in other words, whenever someone changes the definition of
> struct CheckPoint, this test will fail. That seems unnecessary and
> unfriendly. I'm not sure how to improve that without also removing that
> column.
I read florican's results as showing that sizeof(CheckPoint) is already
different on 32-bit machines than 64-bit; it's repeatably getting this:
# Failed test 'check that the slot state changes to "reserved"'
# at t/019_replslot_limit.pl line 125.
# got: '0/15000C0|reserved|192 bytes'
# expected: '0/15000C0|reserved|216 bytes'
This test case was *not* well thought out.
regards, tom lane
