On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:00 PM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> |Copy the index
> |bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to
> |the DSM segment if it's the first time [???] because they allocate locally
> |and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by a different
> |vacuum process the next time."
>
> Is it correct to say: "..if it's the first iteration" and "different process 
> on
> the next iteration" ?  Or "cycle" ?
>

"cycle" sounds better.  I have changed the patch as per your latest
comments.  Let me know what you think?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: v5-0001-Comments-and-doc-fixes-for-commit-40d964ec99.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to