On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 15:11 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > LGTM. I have slightly modified the commit message, see if that looks > fine to you.
Fine with me, thanks. > This breaks the cases where a REPEATABLE READ transaction could see an > empty table if it repeats a COPY statement and somebody truncated the > table in the meantime. I would use "case" rather than "cases" here. Yours, Laurenz Albe
