Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which IMO
>> is the right way forward.  PQsslKeyPassHook_<library>_type would be one
>> option, but perhaps there are better alternatives?

> ISTM this should be renamed yeah -- and it should probably go on the open
> item lists, and with the schedule for the beta perhaps dealt with rather
> urgently?

+1.  Once beta1 is out the cost to change the name goes up noticeably.
Not that we *couldn't* do it later, but it'd be better to have it be
right in beta1.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to