so 16. 5. 2020 v 5:55 odesílatel Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> napsal:
> Em sáb., 16 de mai. de 2020 às 00:07, Pavel Stehule < > pavel.steh...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> >> >> so 16. 5. 2020 v 0:34 odesílatel Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> >> napsal: >> >>> Em dom., 10 de mai. de 2020 às 17:21, Pavel Stehule < >>> pavel.steh...@gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I try to use procedures in Orafce package, and I did some easy >>>> performance tests. I found some hard problems: >>>> >>>> 1. test case >>>> >>>> create or replace procedure p1(inout r int, inout v int) as $$ >>>> begin v := random() * r; end >>>> $$ language plpgsql; >>>> >>>> This command requires >>>> >>>> do $$ >>>> declare r int default 100; x int; >>>> begin >>>> for i in 1..300000 loop >>>> call p1(r, x); >>>> end loop; >>>> end; >>>> $$; >>>> >>>> about 2.2GB RAM and 10 sec. >>>> >>> I am having a consistent result of 3 secs, with a modified version >>> (exec_stmt_call) of your patch. >>> But my notebook is (Core 5, 8GB and SSD), could it be a difference in >>> the testing hardware? >>> >> >> My notebook is old T520, and more I have a configured Postgres with >> --enable-cassert option. >> > The hardware is definitely making a difference, but if you have time and > don't mind testing it, > I can send you a patch, not that the modifications are a big deal, but > maybe they'll help. > send me a patch, please Pavel > > regards, > Ranier Vilela >