On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:44:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > BTW while you're messing with checkpointer, I propose this patch to > simplify things.
It seems to me that this would have a benefit if we begin to have a code path in CreateCheckpoint() where where it makes sense to let the checkpointer know that no checkpoint has happened, and now we assume that a skipped checkpoint is a performed one. As that's not the case now, I would vote for keeping the code as-is. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
