On 5/22/20 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Vik Fearing <v...@postgresfriends.org> writes: >> On 5/22/20 9:09 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >>> As someone who is an unabashed SCRAM fan and was hoping the default >>> would be up'd for v13, I would actually +1 making it the default in v14, >>> i.e. because 9.5 will be EOL at that point, and as such we both have >>> every* driver supporting SCRAM AND every version of PostgreSQL >>> supporting SCRAM. > >> Wasn't SCRAM introduced in 10? > > Yeah. But there's still something to Jonathan's argument, because 9.6 > will go EOL in November 2021, which is pretty close to when v14 will > reach public release (assuming we can hold to the typical schedule). > If we do it in v13, there'll be a full year where still-supported > versions of PG can't do SCRAM, implying that clients would likely > fail to connect to an up-to-date server.
^ that's what I meant. Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
