## Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net): > Ugh, yeah, please don't do that. Renaming them just to make it "look more > modern" helps nobody, really. Especially if the suggestion is people should > be using the shared-launcher binary anyway.
Quick, let's invent a fancy name like "microcommand" for doing this like we're used to; then we tell people that's the new "modern" (anybody cares to write a Medium article for that? (why Medium? it's neither Rare nor Well Done)). What might make sense for (some) version control systems and is tempting in languages which have forgotten howto shared library might not be the best architecture for everything. What has become of the collection of small dedicated tools? Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space
