On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:02 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That thread didn't resolve why check_canonical_path() is necessary > there. Maybe the existing uses could be removed?
This first sentence of this reply seems worthy of particualr attention. We have to know what problem this is intended to fix before we try to decide in which cases it's needed. Otherwise, whether we add it everywhere or remove it everywhere, we'll only know that it's consistent, not that it's correct. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
