On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 2:54 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first > > if others have any comments. > > Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like its > first part. Here is a rework that looks much better to me: > * Load hardcoded DH parameters. > * > - * To prevent problems if the DH parameter files don't even exist, we > - * can load hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend. > + * If DH parameters cannot be loaded from a specified file, we can load > + * the hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend to prevent > + * problems. > > Daniel, is that fine for you?
I don't understand why that change is an improvement. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
