Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > This is a patch to make use of RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE() where appropriate, > instead of listing out the relkinds individually. No behavior change is > intended. > This was originally part of the patch from [0], but it seems worth > moving forward independently.
Passes eyeball examination. I did not try to search for other places
where RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE should be used.
regards, tom lane
