On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 05:51:21PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > I feel if Sawada-San or someone involved in another patch also once > > studies this approach and try to come up with some form of comparison > > then we might be able to make better decision. It is possible that > > there are few good things in each approach which we can use. > > Agreed. Postgres-XL code is under the Postgres license: > > Postgres-XL is released under the PostgreSQL License, a liberal Open > Source license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses. > > and even says they want it moved into Postgres core: > > https://www.postgres-xl.org/2017/08/postgres-xl-9-5-r1-6-announced/ > > Postgres-XL is a massively parallel database built on top of, > and very closely compatible with PostgreSQL 9.5 and its set of > advanced > features. Postgres-XL is fully open source and many parts of it will > feed back directly or indirectly into later releases of PostgreSQL, as > we begin to move towards a fully parallel sharded version of core > PostgreSQL. > > so we should understand what can be used from it. >
+1. I think that will be quite useful. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
