On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:16:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Also, wolfSSL is developed by a company and dual GPL/commerical > > licenses, so it seems like a mismatch to me. > > Yeah, that's definitely a factor behind my disinterest in > making wolfSSL be the only alternative. However, as long as > it's available on GPL terms, I don't see a problem with it > being one alternative.
Yeah, I guess it depends on how much Postgres code it takes to support it. Company-developed open source stuff usually goes into pay mode once it gets popular, so I am not super-excited to be going in this direction. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
