> On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:26, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In short, I really think we ought to reject this patch and move on. > Maybe it could be resurrected sometime in the future when we have a > better handle on when to cache plans and when not. > > If you want to press forward with it anyway, certainly the lack of > any tests in this patch is another big objection. Perhaps you > could create a pgbench TAP script that exercises the logic.
Based on Tom's review, and that nothing has been submitted since, I've marked this entry as returned with feedback. Feel to open a new entry if you want to address Tom's comments and take this further. cheers ./daniel
