On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:56:53AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think "routine" was more correct.  We introduced that terminology to
> encompass both functions and procedures, back when real procedures were
> added.  See the definitions in the glossary for example.

Okay, fine by me, while we have getProcedureTypeDescription() working
on pg_proc entries ;)

> I'm not sure that I'll have time to review this in the next couple of
> days, but it seemed sufficiently good when I last looked.

Thanks.  I'll try to come back to it next week or the one after for
another round of self-review, and I'll see what to do at this point.
This has been around for three years, it can still wait a bit.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to