On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 20:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed questioned this longstanding behavior:
>
> regression=# SELECT 'nan'::float8 / '0'::float8;
> ERROR: division by zero
>
> After a bit of research I think he's right: per IEEE 754 this should
> yield NaN, not an error. Accordingly I propose the attached patch.
> This is probably not something to back-patch, though.
>
Agreed.
> One thing that's not very clear to me is which of these spellings
> is preferable:
>
> if (unlikely(val2 == 0.0) && !isnan(val1))
> if (unlikely(val2 == 0.0 && !isnan(val1)))
>
My guess is that the first would be better, since it would tell the
compiler that it's unlikely to need to do the NaN test, so it would be
kind of like doing
if (unlikely(val2 == 0.0))
if (!isnan(val1)))
Regards,
Dean
