Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:53 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Pushed with some fiddling. Mainly, if we're going to the trouble of
>> checking for binary mode here, we might as well skip allocating the
>> line_buf too.
> Isn't it good if we backpatch this to versions 13, 12, 11 and so on?
Given the lack of complaints, I wasn't excited about it. Transient
consumption of 64K is not a huge deal these days. (And yes, I've
worked on machines where that was the entire address space. But that
was a very long time ago.)
regards, tom lane
